Recent Mobility Discussions
Sony Ericsson launches the I...
SE-dot is a new community where we invite users to share ideas and bring them to life, by asking the simple question: What do you want your...
Recent Mobility Reviews
Recent Mobility News
Mobility Today Store
Mobility Today Forums
Mobility Today Podcasts
Mobility Today Links
|
Where Do You Want To Go Today? Let OnCourse Guide You!
By , posted Friday, Dec. 30th, 2005
Reader Comments: 26
The Program
After activation, there is a very short (7 page) introduction that you view to start off. Of course, I skipped that…big mistake! Fortunately, you can see it anytime from the settings menu. I recommend that you do view it because it gives you a very quick basic overview but more importantly, you won’t make the same mistake I made. For me, page 7 was the most important and if I had read it, I would have saved myself a lot of aggravation in trying to access a feature I wanted but couldn’t figure out how to get!
Of course I was really psyched to try this new navigation package so I enabled the Bluetooth receiver and immediately started to run the software (NOTE: With the Automatic detection feature, it accurately detected the com port and baud rate of the Bluetooth receiver. My GPS setting was automatically configured and saved for all subsequent use).
The opening navigation screen gave me eight buttons and 4 icons to start my navigation. The buttons were for Navigation, Home, Voice Recognition, Favorites, Recent Destinations, Map, Settings and Quit. The icons were for a TMC Receiver (not available in the US yet), GPS Status, Logbook and a Windows icon.
Pressing Navigation, a screen appeared that allowed me to pick a region and enter an address. There were two buttons for Points of Interest and two additional icons appeared at the bottom of the screen (previous page and opening page). Clicking on address, a screen appeared where I could enter zip code, city, street, number and even intersection. The option to Show it on a map, Save it or Start Navigation was at the bottom. Of course I chose Start Navigation where the program immediately calculated the route. I was impressed with its speed although it was a very simple and short distance. There will be many more tests to see just how fast it is.
 |
 |
As soon as the route was calculated, a screen appeared in 14 seconds with the route displayed. The display was zoomed in and there were indicators telling me where I was, what street I was to take the next turn on, the distance I needed to go to take the turn, anticipated time of arrival with the time for the trip and the total distance of 28 miles to travel. In addition, once the map was displayed, the return icons (for the previous page and the first page) were replaced with the word INFO. Pressing on this gives a very pleasant woman’s voice telling you the next turn.
There was an icon in the upper right that when pressed changed the view from full screen to a smaller screen surrounded by 7 items to choose from: A Hand to move the map, North Up, GPS current position, 3D view, the icon to display or not display these icons, Beginning to End of trip and a Zoom in/out bar. I spent quite a bit of time playing with these controls and was quite pleased with their function and ease of use.
With any new program, spending the time “playing” with its interface to get a through understanding of how it works is important. I was really pleased with the overall performance of the program especially because I could find a place that I wanted to get to rather quickly. It was a very short learning curve and pretty much intuitive but I just could not figure out one thing.
I like the ability to go back and use Recent Destinations so you did not have to re-input the information and I liked the ease of saving a destination so it would appear in Favorites folder. A great feature when you save it is that you have an option for adding a Voice Tag for easy retrieval while driving. What a terrific feature!
|
crypticways, thanks for your post. We are fully aware of the issue you mentioned about "OCN5 prefers taking highway/secondary highway rather than Interstate highway as you are approaching the final destination". We have a fix now and it will be scheduled to be released in the upcoming version 5.3 patch (free download for all registered users).
Thanks for your patience.
Posted by
,
Saturday, Jan. 14th, 2006
|
|
Jack, my hats off to you. You did an excellent review. I've been an OCN5 user since November 2005. I did nearly 2 months of research before making my decision and as you I'm pleasantly pleased with OCN5. I agree that it takes a bit to startup (30 seconds or so) and that the having to agree to the terms each and everytime you start the program is annoying, but overall OCN is an excellent piece of software. The routing isn't always perfect, but it's really good. Example: sometimes OCN routes me over state routes instead of the interstate, when the interstate is faster (my settings are correct). It still gets me there though. The first few weeks I wasn't sure if I could trust it for daily use and always carried a map with me just incase. OCN has proved to be reliable and trustworthy.
|
|
Jack,
I just received the OnCourse two days ago. What a fabulous item. I could not agree with you more about the features of the BT GPS unit! The software is also quite robust and saved me from a wrong turn yesterday as I was looking for an unfamiliar address.
This is my third GPS purchase (the first was the sleeve for the 5455). At this point I can see that the quality of this package will encourage me to use it often. I can't say that for the other two units I have purchased.
I did compare the GPS BT unit with my other one and you were absolutely right about the time to fix. . . WOW and thanks!
Posted by
lmac,
Tuesday, Dec. 6th, 2005
|
|
trcoker,
Yes, if you get the XL for example, then you get ALL the regional maps under it.
My guess is that it would work very well.
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 29th, 2005
|
|
That sounds reasonable. Memory has always been an issue on devices and the 6515 is no exception.
I have not tried it on the 6515 because the XL maps are just about 1 gig. I only have 1 gig SD cards so it would preclude me from using other programs.
Considering the fact that I rarely travel away from the east coast, it most likely would not be a problem to load regional maps...but then again, i wanted the ability to use it when ever-where ever which is why I chose to use my 2750....two memory cards.
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 29th, 2005
|
|
I contacted the OnCourseNavigator team and this is the response that i got when I asked about using the OCN5 with the hp6315.
I think that in Jack's review he said that these regional maps are included for no extra charge? Is that correct?
Does anyone think that it would be a mistake for me to buy this for my 6315?
Thanks
Dear Valued Customer,
Yes, it has been tested and fully compatible.
Due to the limited free memory on this device and the slower processor than industry average of 400mhz on this device, we only recommend the OCN5 (M) Regional map or the OCN5 (L) all regional maps. Do not proceed with OCN5 (XL) or (XXL), which requires at least 30 MB for free memory space.
If you have any other questions or concerns please feel free to contact us via email and we will gladly assist you.
Best Regards,
OnCourse Navigator Team
Easy PocketNAV.com LLC
www.OnCourseNavigator.com
Posted by
trcoker,
Monday, Nov. 28th, 2005
|
|
trcoker
I have not tried the software on the 6315 but I would expect it to work.
|
|
Jack,
What do you think about using this on a Hp6315?
Thanks
Posted by
trcoker,
Thursday, Nov. 24th, 2005
|
|
GeekNJ
You said: "A friend of mine tried this application and he found that there's no way to view the legs of a route that is calculated. Is that correct or did he just not find the option to do that?"
It is not correct, he is wrong. I posted a screenshot on the thread you referenced showing a route with three stops. It is pretty easy to show the route.
You asked: "Can you time some sample route calculation times?"
I thought I had mentioned times in the review. The times ranged from 14 sec to about 1 minute 40 seconds depending on the length of the trip and the type of road traveled.
A trip from Boston to the western part of the state of Massachusetts, a distance of 84 miles, took 17 seconds. I think that is pretty good time.
I think they did a great job route calculation. For me, it is fast. If there is a faster program out there, them I guess they would arrive sooner than me (unless they hit a red light).
Why did I select this product? This product had what I was looking for and the advice I received from friends, comments I read from the experts in the GPS field and my investigations of the specs lead me to make this my new GPS solution. Its performance has proved that I made the correct decision.
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
In the review you also mentioned you investigated other potential solutions. What were the other products and what made you select this solution over the others?
Posted by
GeekNJ,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
I mentioned an apparent deficiency in the forum thread on this product and thought I'd mention it here again since it wasn't in your review.
A friend of mine tried this application and he found that there's no way to view the legs of a route that is calculated. Is that correct or did he just not find the option to do that?
Can you time some sample route calculation times? You mentioned a few that you did (to FL, To CA and to Chicago). How long does it take to calculate the route? How about a 40 mile trip using local streets to start/end? Just wondering how "fast" is fast. I know you're used to Delorme since you've mentioned it often and that is extremely slow so it would be good for those that are interested to know what you mean by "fast".
I'm also interested in a SIRF III unit... so I'll be checking some out after Xmas.
Posted by
GeekNJ,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
WOW Jack reading this review makes me want to buy the darn thing. I am glad you enjoyed it and hope you never get lost again.. LOL
|
|
Well, I think you are going to be very happy with it (even without that 10%).
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Well, I went ahead and bought the Christmas package. I wish they still had the additional 10% off coupon (expired Nov 15th). That would have made it even easier to justify buying!
Posted by
,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Thanks Jerry...not bad. I hope they can make it happen.
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Take a look how 3d/Names looks on PMN. They have a few screen shots on the front page.
http://www.pocketmap.com/navigator.html
Posted by
JNGold,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Jerry,
The street name for 3D view would be a wonderful option and I hope they can implement it. I wonder how it will effect the view?
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
I'm drooling as I read!!! Wonderful review Jack!!
Posted by
,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Cool. I am looking to replace PocketMap Navigator on my 2750, so this may be the one. :)
Posted by
JNGold,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
I spoke about a feature that OnCourse was looking at based on user input. 3D view with street names is one such request.
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
I agree that certain roads are a PIA so having the ability to BLOCK is a great feature prior to setting the route. It works well.
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
3d mode would be more useful if street names were included.
Posted by
JNGold,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Ooopps....didn't notice the image! Doh!
Ok, I understand. However, I want the ability to avoid certain roads I know to be a "PIA" for traveling. Sometimes GPS apps "think" they know the best route, but they can be wrong. If I have the ability to block roads before I travel, I then have the ultimate in flexibility.
Posted by
JNGold,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Jerry, I thought is was pretty obvious from the lead picture. It says NAVTEQ On Board. When you see NAVTEQ on Board, it means that the data is precise, robust, detailed, and reliable. I have found the maps to be extraordinary in my testing which has been for Maine to Pennsylvania. I did a lot of traveling to test this software. It is phenomenal!
Yes, I have been able to use the block road feature as I planned a trip but frankly, once I planned a trip I left it that way. As I drove, if I wanted to go a different way than what was routed, it quickly re-routed.
I am absolutely amazed at the speed of re-routing that the program has.
Posted by
Jack Cook,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Jack,
Your review doesn't mention if the maps are Navteq, TeleAtlas, or custom (unless I missed it). I have used both TeleAtlas and NavTeq and I find that NavTeq maps are a heck of a lot more accurate in my neck of the woods.
Also, can the "Block road" function be used prior to the trip commencing. If I know to avoid a particular stretch of roads (either for construction or I know there is a better way), can I enable that function before I travel and have OnCourse re-do the route?
Thanks.
Posted by
JNGold,
Tuesday, Nov. 22nd, 2005
|
|
Jack,
Great review. This certainly sounds like a great device. I can't wait to hear about the MyGuide 500. This is a device that I could really get into.
|
|
Login with your Mobility Today account below or Register to post a comment!
You may also use your Facebook account to post comments:
|
|